Crypto editions run every day, including weekends. Checks start 45 minutes before regular Tokyo, London and New York stock-market hours. Publication follows research.
Exchange openings skip verified holidays and weekends. London’s holiday calendar is not verified yet, so it is excluded from the opening countdown.
The next update is overdue. You are reading the last saved edition, with its original publication date. Reload to check again.
The catch-up
News from the last 24 hours, plus clearly dated ongoing developments and upcoming events.
Visa is recoding memecoin card buys on Robinhood Wallet and Fomo, reports say
The Block and Crypto Briefing said Visa is telling processors, including Checkout.com, to stop coding memecoin purchases as digital media under merchant category code 5815, a label that let some Visa cardholders earn ordinary points or cash back. The checkout runs through Crossmint on Robinhood Wallet and Fomo and was still live. A grace period is described as ending next week, after which those buys would use Visa's crypto transaction rules. A Crossmint spokesperson told The Block its procedures have not changed. Visa has not posted a public notice in the sources reviewed.
Visa is recoding memecoin card buys on Robinhood Wallet and Fomo, reports say
The Block and Crypto Briefing said Visa is telling processors, including Checkout.com, to stop coding memecoin purchases as digital media under merchant category code 5815, a label that let some Visa cardholders earn ordinary points or cash back. The checkout runs through Crossmint on Robinhood Wallet and Fomo and was still live. A grace period is described as ending next week, after which those buys would use Visa's crypto transaction rules. A Crossmint spokesperson told The Block its procedures have not changed. Visa has not posted a public notice in the sources reviewed.
Why it matters Anyone buying memecoins with a Visa card in Robinhood Wallet or Fomo may lose rewards and hit crypto-purchase restrictions. This is a card-network coding change, not a ban, and the cutover is not a dated public Visa circular.
Robinhood Wallet is Robinhood's self-custodial crypto wallet, separate from Robinhood Chain, the company's public Arbitrum-based layer 2. Crossmint is a checkout provider that lets apps sell memecoins for card payments. Merchant category codes tell card networks what a purchase is. Code 5815 is for digital goods and media. Crypto purchases are often excluded from ordinary card rewards and can face extra restrictions. Crypto Briefing, citing The Block's earlier investigation, said some Crossmint-powered buys were coded as digital media, that JPMorgan Chase flagged the coding, and that Visa confirmed at least one misclassified transaction. It also said the arrangement allowed up to $1,000 a day without KYC, with a $1 million total cap. Fomo is a separate memecoin app named in the same reporting. The change, as described, would recode supported memecoin card buys as crypto transactions rather than stop them. Crossmint's comment that its procedures have not changed, and the still-live checkout, are the limits of what is confirmed. Next week is not a calendar date from Visa.
Robinhood Chain fees fall 97% from the memecoin peak while trading stays busy
CoinDesk, using growthepie figures, said Robinhood Chain fees fell about 97% from an early-September peak of roughly $8 million in a day to about $230,000 on 16 September, across 8.9 million transactions. Robinhood Chain is Robinhood's public Arbitrum-based layer 2 for onchain trading. growthepie data last updated 19 September still showed about $292,500 in daily fees, 9.6 million transactions, and $1.04 billion in stablecoins. CoinDesk put weekly DEX volume through 16 September at about $13 billion, up 5%, and said that print does not show a wholesale shift of flow to Solana.
Why it matters Chain fee income is no longer a useful proxy for whether the network is in use. Apps, especially launchpads and Uniswap, still take more in fees than the chain. Anyone researching Pons, GMGN, or Robinhood Wallet flow should look at DEX volume and app revenue, not yesterday's gas bill.
Robinhood Chain went to public mainnet on 1 July 2026 as an Ethereum layer 2 built on Arbitrum. Official docs still describe it as permissionless, EVM-compatible, and aimed at tokenized stocks and other real-world assets, with ETH as gas. In practice, a late-August memecoin wave made it one of the most expensive networks. CoinDesk said applications earned $2.7 million on 30 August, with token launcher Pons and memecoin terminal GMGN supplying about $2 million as users created 22,600 tokens in 24 hours. At the early-September peak the chain took about $8 million in fees on 13.1 million transactions, or about 64 cents each. By 16 September that was about 2.6 cents. CoinDesk's seven-day comparison through 16 September has Pons volume down 37% to about $616 million and Pons protocol revenue down to $5.8 million, while Uniswap V3 volume on the chain more than doubled to $5.3 billion and Uniswap V4 fell 22% to $4.9 billion. Weekly DEX volume across venues rose 5% to about $12.8 billion to $13 billion. Solana DEX volume in the same week was about $17 billion, down 8%, so the data does not show Robinhood users simply moving there. deBridge flows were a modest net $2 million from Robinhood Chain to Solana. growthepie's 19 September snapshot still ranks the chain first among tracked networks by transaction count, with daily active addresses around 414,000. App revenue on that print was about $6.12 million, far above chain fees. These are third-party indexed figures, not a Robinhood audited report, and they do not split tokenized stocks from memecoins.
Upcoming: 29 Sept, 22:30 UTC. Announced 16 Sept, 15:49 UTC.
Robinhood will livestream HOOD Summit on 29-30 September for new active-trader tools
@RobinhoodApp told followers to tune in 29-30 September. Official pages put HOOD Summit '26 in Houston, with Chairman and CEO Vlad Tenev's keynote at 5:30 p.m. Central on 29 September, livestreamed in the Robinhood app, on X, YouTube and robinhood.com/presents. The company says the keynote will show new tools for active traders, and that 30 September main-stage sessions will also stream. No product list, including any Robinhood Chain feature, has been published. The dates are announced, not a guaranteed launch.
Why it matters This is a scheduled product window for Robinhood users and anyone watching Robinhood Chain, not a live button. Treat social rumors as unverified until the livestream names what is shipping, where, and when.
Robinhood Chain is Robinhood's permissionless Ethereum Layer 2, built on Arbitrum technology, using ETH for gas and aimed at tokenized stocks and onchain apps. HOOD Summit is the company's annual event. A 10 August newsroom post already set Houston for 29-30 September. The 16 September teaser does not change those dates. In late September, Central Time is daylight time (UTC-5), so 5:30 p.m. CT is 22:30 UTC. Specific chain, wallet or brokerage features remain unnamed until the keynote.
Sunrise lists BlackBerry's BB tokenized stock on Solana, now trading on Raydium
@sunrise said $BB is now listed on @solana via Sunrise, issued by Backpack Securities, and posted BBosJLw8ZzoATiEyywiifx7AgmrD2Cm3XjFWbhbRhChy as the canonical Solana contract. @Raydium said $BB is live there for 24/7 trading via Sunrise and Backpack Securities. @LaunchOnSF said users can launch coins paired with $BB on StonkFun. Sunrise is a Solana listing venue that brings outside assets onto DEX markets with a single canonical mint. BB is the NYSE ticker for BlackBerry Limited. The listing posts do not spell out redemption, issuer custody, or U.S. eligibility.
Why it matters A familiar listed stock is now a Solana token with a published mint, a Raydium market, and a launchpad pairing. Readers can inspect the mint and the DEX market, and should not treat this as a brokerage share without checking Backpack's own terms.
Sunrise lists outside assets onto Solana so wallets and DEXs can point at one mint instead of competing copies. Backpack Securities is the issuer named on the listing. Tokenized stocks on Solana can trade when traditional U.S. cash-equity markets are closed. Raydium is a major Solana DEX. StonkFun, posted by @LaunchOnSF, lets users launch new coins paired with the stock token. BlackBerry is a software company whose QNX system Raydium said is used in more than 275 million vehicles. That product note is not a claim about token economics. Earlier Sunrise listings this week, including CYPH, used the same issuer-and-canonical-mint pattern. The Sunrise and Raydium posts do not describe how a holder redeems into a traditional brokerage share, who holds the underlying equity, or who is allowed to buy it. Secondary recaps that add 1:1 redemption or extra wallet names are not a substitute for those issuer terms.
@sanctumIR said Sanctum's governance proposal passed and that 259 million CLOUD from the Community Reserve will be permanently burned, taking total supply from 1 billion to about 741 million. @sanctumso said the proposal to burn 25% of supply has passed. Sanctum is Solana's liquid-staking layer, and CLOUD is its token. MetaDAO still shows sanctum-009 as passed, authorizing the team to burn that reserve. The posts describe a burn that will happen, not a confirmed burn transaction. A separate ticker change from CLOUD to SANC is a metadata update and was not the vote.
Why it matters Holders and venues watching CLOUD need to know the unused community reserve is now authorized for destruction, which removes a future distribution overhang if the burn lands. The mint address is unchanged, and the burn should be checked onchain rather than assumed complete.
Sanctum runs liquid staking on Solana. CLOUD launched with a large Community Reserve. Sanctum has said only about 48 million of an original roughly 307 million in that reserve was ever distributed, and that the leftover pool deterred investors who treated it as overhang. The burn vote, run through MetaDAO decision markets, authorizes destroying the remaining 259 million from that reserve. Sanctum's Strategic Reserve, described earlier as about 110 million tokens for compensation, talent, and grants, was outside the proposal. The ticker change to SANC is a name, symbol, and logo update. Sanctum has said tokenomics and the token address stay the same. A passed vote is permission to burn, not proof the tokens are already gone. The investor dashboard at investors.sanctum.so is the project's own tokenomics page to recheck after any burn lands.
Upcoming: 20 Sept, 15:19 UTC. Announced 17 Sept, 15:19 UTC.
ZetaChain vote to shut its L1 and move ZETA to Solana is due 20 September
@ZetaChain opened a 72-hour holder vote on 17 September to convert ZETA 1:1 into a native Solana SPL token and wind down ZetaChain's own layer 1. ZetaChain is a blockchain project that now says its product is Anuma, a private multi-model AI app with more than 300,000 users since February. If the vote passes, Anuma would run on Solana and users would lock ZETA for AI credits. The official blog says nothing moves before the vote passes, there is no migration date yet, and exchanges must still confirm any conversion. If it fails, the L1 continues as today.
Why it matters A passed vote would move a live consumer app and its token onto Solana and retire a separate L1. Holders, stakers and any exchange listing ZETA should watch the ZetaHub result due 20 September. It is an announced vote, not a completed migration.
ZetaChain launched in 2021 as a layer 1 meant to connect other blockchains. In 2026 the team says its working product is Anuma, a private AI chat app that keeps encrypted memory under the user's wallet keys and routes prompts across many models. The 17 September proposal would make ZETA a native Solana token, keep the ticker and total supply, leave Ethereum and BSC ZETA untouched, and shut the ZetaChain L1 after holders move. Staking on Solana is still being designed. Exchange support is not automatic. The vote opened with the 17 September post and was described as running 72 hours, which puts the announced close on 20 September after this edition's cutoff. Until then validators keep running. Readers should treat the outcome as pending.
Coinbase tokenized stocks pass $1B in DEX volume on Base
@base said Coinbase Tokenized Stocks crossed $1 billion in volume on Base, and a later @base recap said that happened in less than a month. @jessepollak amplified the figure. Base is Coinbase's Ethereum layer 2. The tokens are Coinbase-issued stock tokens, built on Base's B20 standard, for eligible users outside the United States. The posts do not name a data vendor, say whether the $1 billion is cumulative DEX volume only, or break the total out by name. The same recap said NVDAc had passed 10,000 holders.
Why it matters The print is a usage marker for Coinbase's stock tokens on Base, not a U.S. listing. Anyone researching B20 markets, Aerodrome, or stock-backed lending should inspect which names actually traded and whether they are allowed in their jurisdiction. U.S. persons remain excluded on Base's own terms.
Coinbase Tokenized Stocks are meant to represent real share ownership held by a custodian, including events such as dividends and splits, rather than a synthetic price token. @base has repeatedly said they are only available in eligible jurisdictions outside the United States. The $1 billion figure is an official Base claim. This check did not independently re-tally DEX prints. Base's 19 September recap also said network stablecoin market cap had reached $5 billion and that Cobalt will add validity transactions, which execute only when stated onchain conditions are met. Separate Morpho markets for borrowing USDC against a small set of those stock tokens were already live before this window, with early usage still small in 18 September coverage, and those markets are not for U.S. persons. Readers should treat the $1 billion headline as cumulative activity on Base, not as proof of deep, two-sided liquidity in every ticker.
Base now says EIP-8130 will ship later this year, while Cobalt still omits it
@base said EIP-8130 is now set to ship later this year, bringing batch transactions, gas abstraction, multiple key types, key rotation, and portable accounts. That is a new official timing note after talks to merge Base-led EIP-8130 with Ethereum's EIP-8141 broke down last week, as Ethlabs' @decentrek described and CoinDesk reported. Base's Cobalt page still dates Sepolia to 23 September 2026 and mainnet to 30 September 2026, listing B20 changes, validity transactions, dynamic upgrades, and a TEE migration, not EIP-8130. Neither wallet standard is live on mainnet. Later this year is not a dated launch.
Why it matters Wallets and apps that span Base and Ethereum may still need two transaction formats. Cobalt is the near-term Base upgrade to watch for validity transactions. EIP-8130 remains a later, separate ship, not something the Cobalt overview currently schedules.
Account abstraction is the effort to make crypto wallets work more like normal apps: passkeys instead of seed phrases, apps paying fees, and several steps in one click. Base and Ethereum spent months trying to agree on one transaction format. Those talks failed, leaving EIP-8130 and EIP-8141 on separate tracks. CoinDesk reported that wallets covering both networks may have to support two formats. On 19 September Base's own recap added that EIP-8130 would ship later this year and that Cobalt will introduce validity transactions, meaning signed transactions that the chain includes only if onchain conditions match. The official Cobalt overview still does not list EIP-8130 among Cobalt features. Sepolia is marked for 23 September and mainnet for 30 September. Those dates are announced shipping targets, not a guarantee, and they have no hour attached on the docs page. This still matters because Base is pushing B20 stock tokens, Coinbase Wallet, and consumer apps that will inherit whichever wallet standard actually ships.
Arc's hosted x402 Facilitator is live for USDC on Arc, Base and Polygon
@arc said agentic payments are live, with a hosted Facilitator Service so x402 builders can accept Circle-issued USDC. Circle's docs say the service verifies a buyer's signed authorization and submits the USDC transfer onchain on Arc, Base and Polygon PoS, without the seller running a relayer or a gas wallet. A keyless trial is available, then a Circle API key is required to settle. Circle does not hold user funds. Arc settlements are described as final. Base and Polygon settlements can reorg. The 19 September post is still the current product notice.
Why it matters This is a working way to charge agents and APIs in USDC on Arc without operating chain infrastructure. The same integration also settles on Base, so existing x402 sellers can add Arc without a separate stack. Docs describe the product. They are not a usage report.
Arc is Circle's layer 1, public mainnet since 16 September 2026, with USDC as gas. x402 is an HTTP payment standard that lets APIs and agents charge per request. A facilitator checks a signed payment and posts it onchain so the seller does not run a node or fund gas. Circle's hosted Facilitator Service does that for USDC using EIP-3009 transfer-with-authorization. Sellers can try it without an account, then need a Circle API key to settle. Circle says it screens both parties and pays settlement gas. The service is software from Circle Technology Services, LLC, and is not described as a custody product. Because settlement also runs on Base, this item belongs with Arc but matters to Base builders too.
Upcoming: 15 Oct, 03:59 UTC. Announced 17 Sept, 13:00 UTC.
Arc offers 20 microgrants of $500 USDC for live mainnet mini apps
@arc said it will award 20 microgrants of $500 USDC to eligible early builders shipping working mini apps on Arc mainnet. The Arc House page puts the pool at 10,000 USDC and says submissions need a live mainnet link and a public repo. Submissions close 14 October 2026 at 23:59 ET, with all decisions by 21 October. Testnet-only work, mockups, and projects already funded by a Circle or Arc program are ineligible. Payout is in USDC on Arc after verification. Awards are not guaranteed, and program counts can change.
Why it matters The window is still open for anyone who can ship a working Arc mainnet mini app with a public repo. It is a small, dated builder path, not the separate discretionary capital figure discussed around the drone show.
Arc opened public mainnet on 16 September as Circle's USDC-gas chain. Microgrants sit beside Arc Studio and Portal as a way for early apps to get a $500 USDC payout after verification, rather than a priced token sale or a guaranteed venture round. The program still requires a live mainnet link. Circle and Arc already-funded work is excluded. The close time is announced, not a promise that 20 awards will be paid.
Blink Wallet pauses after custodial drain, then restores service and pledges to make users whole
@blinkbtc paused Blink services after an attacker accessed a limited number of custodial accounts and withdrew funds. A later update said a few dozen custodial accounts were hit, that every affected account is identified and will be made whole, and that non-custodial balances were unaffected. By 20:19 UTC the same day, Blink said services were back online, the vulnerability was fixed and verified, unaffected accounts were restored, and affected accounts would stay locked temporarily. No loss figure was published. A post-mortem is promised.
Why it matters Custodial Lightning users can be frozen or drained even when most funds stay safe. Readers using Blink should treat this as a live incident: services resumed, affected accounts remain locked, and the technical cause is not yet in a public post-mortem.
Blink is a Bitcoin Lightning wallet that offers custodial accounts, where Blink holds the keys, and non-custodial balances, where users hold their own. The company's first public notice at 12:41 UTC on 19 September said services were paused while it investigated. It said the large majority of funds were secure and that non-custodial wallets were not affected. Later the same day it narrowed the impact to a few dozen custodial accounts and said those users need take no action to be reimbursed. The restore post said the vulnerability behind the incident has been fixed and verified. Affected accounts remaining locked is a containment step, not a statement that those users have already received funds back. Blink did not publish how the attacker got in, how much was withdrawn, or which country or vector was involved. Some secondary reports discussed whether the Spark Bitcoin payments protocol was involved. Blink's own posts do not name Spark. Until the promised post-mortem, that link is unconfirmed.
Injective says INJ is live across Solana apps including Jupiter, Raydium and Phantom
@injective said $INJ is now live on @LaunchOnSF, @MeteoraAG, @fomo, @Pumpfun, @Raydium, @JupiterExchange, @moonshot, @Titan_Exchange, @dflow, @birdeye_so, @sunrise and @phantom, with more to come. Injective is a trading-focused blockchain whose INJ token is now being offered as a Solana-side asset in those apps. The post is Injective's own integration list, not a third-party volume print, and it does not say how much INJ was minted on Solana or whether the listing is a native SPL issuance versus a wrapped route.
Why it matters Solana users can now look up INJ in wallets and DEXs they already use, which is a concrete new market for an asset that previously lived mainly on Injective. The claim to inspect is the venue list, not a guaranteed deep book.
Injective is a separate chain built for onchain trading, tokenization, and related activity. Putting INJ into Solana launchpads, DEXs, and wallets means a Solana user can trade or launch against INJ without first opening an Injective-native app. Sunrise appearing on the list does not make INJ a tokenized stock. Pump.fun, Raydium, Jupiter, and Phantom are among Solana's most used launch, swap, and wallet surfaces. Injective's post does not publish contract addresses, circulating supply on Solana, or redemption mechanics. A same-day company post about Injective USDC and Noble USDC is a different asset-standard claim and is not covered here. Readers who want to use INJ on Solana should verify the mint inside the named app rather than relying on the screenshot list alone.
SEC issues a five-year Innovation Exemption for onchain trading of tokenized U.S. stocks
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on 17 September issued a temporary Innovation Exemption so Tokenized Securities Venues can run permissioned automated market makers for tokenized NMS stocks without being treated as exchanges. Matching dealer relief applies to some liquidity providers. Tokens must give holders the same rights as the listed share. Issuers get notice and can object to third-party tokenization. Smart contracts must be public on a public permissionless ledger. Symbol and volume caps apply, and trading must stop if the listing exchange stops. The order lasts five years after publication and asks for comment. It does not by itself list any token on Solana, Base or Robinhood Chain.
Why it matters This is the first SEC path for onchain trading of tokenized U.S. listed stocks. It could change who may operate venues and which stock tokens U.S. persons can use, including products already trading offshore on Solana, Base and Robinhood Chain. Venues still have to qualify. Issuers can opt out.
NMS stocks are the listed U.S. equities that trade on national market system venues. Tokenizing them has been legally awkward in the United States because an AMM pool can look like an unregistered exchange and a liquidity provider can look like a dealer. The Innovation Exemption is a five-year, conditional order, not a new statute. It creates Tokenized Securities Venues that may run permissioned AMM pools for tokenized NMS stock. Tokens must carry the same rights as the listed share, including dividends and voting. Issuers get notice and can object when a third party tokenizes their stock. Contracts must be public and on a public permissionless chain. Trading must halt if the primary exchange halts. Coinbase's existing Base stock tokens, Sunrise listings on Solana, and Robinhood Chain stock tokens are not automatically covered. A venue still has to operate as a TSV and meet the conditions. U.S. eligibility for those products remains a separate question. The order also seeks public comment on possible changes.