Read the latest Pulse

London edition

News checked through

Published 18 Sept, 06:19 UTC

You are reading a saved edition, not live news. News window: 17 Sept, 06:15 UTC to 18 Sept, 06:15 UTC. Labelled ongoing and upcoming items retain their own dates.

The catch-up

News from the last 24 hours, plus clearly dated ongoing developments and upcoming events.

Rumble RUM is listed on Solana via Sunrise, with Raydium trading live

@sunrise said $RUM is listed on Solana and issued by Backpack Securities. It posted canonical mint RUMsPfFZFnN1ZmGANwP7FNMjKH4m9RiMePrtVtLe7 as the Solana version. Hours later, @Raydium said $RUM is live on Raydium, calling Rumble a video-sharing and cloud company now trading around the clock via Sunrise and Backpack Securities. Sunrise is a Solana listing venue that brings assets, including tokenized stocks, onto DEX markets. The posts do not publish U.S. eligibility, redemption mechanics, or any claim that this ticker falls under the SEC Innovation Exemption.

Read story

Robinhood

3 developments

Robinhood backs the SEC innovation exemption for onchain tokenized stocks

@RobinhoodApp said it supports the @SECGov innovation exemption. The company said Americans should have access to crypto technology, including instant settlement, 24/7 trading, and fractionalization by default. The post is a policy stance, not a product launch. It does not say Robinhood, Robinhood Wallet, or Robinhood Chain is a Tokenized Securities Venue, or that stock tokens already trading on the chain now qualify under the order.

Why it matters Robinhood already offers tokenized stocks and runs Robinhood Chain. The SEC order is a five-year, conditional U.S. path for permissioned onchain trading of real listed shares. The tweet shows the brokerage wants that path. It does not by itself change deposits, listings, or who can trade those tokens today.

Read the context

Robinhood is a U.S. brokerage with a crypto app, a self-custodial wallet, and Robinhood Chain, an Ethereum layer 2 that went live on 1 July 2026. The chain was built for tokenized stocks and other onchain trading. Outside developers also use it to launch tokens and run DEXs. Tokenized stocks are blockchain representations of shares. Some versions aim to carry the same economic and legal rights as the listed stock. Others are synthetic price trackers. The SEC's 17 September Innovation Exemption is aimed at the first kind, traded in permissioned automated market maker pools, not at every stock-named token on a public chain. Robinhood's post does not claim the brokerage has applied to operate a Tokenized Securities Venue, and it does not list which of its stock-token products would meet the order's same-rights, issuer-notice, U.S.-person, and volume-limit conditions. Readers who use Robinhood Chain apps or stock tokens should watch whether any Robinhood venue, wallet flow, or chain market later says it is relying on the exemption. Until then, treat this as political and product-roadmap context, not a live trading-rule change inside the app.

Link to this story

Robinhood Ventures Fund I puts $25 million into Crusoe's $3.9 billion round

@RobinhoodApp said Robinhood Ventures Fund I invested $25 million in @CrusoeAI as part of Crusoe's $3.9 billion Series F, which values the company at $30.9 billion. Robinhood's newsroom says the purchase of preferred stock closed on 31 August 2026 and was announced on 17 September. RVI is a New York Stock Exchange closed-end fund meant to give ordinary investors exposure to private companies. Crusoe builds energy-first AI data centers and cloud infrastructure. This is a fund holding, not a Robinhood Chain, wallet, or crypto-app launch.

Why it matters RVI is a listed Robinhood vehicle, so the Crusoe stake is now part of what RVI holders are exposed to. It does not add a token, DEX, or chain feature. Crypto readers should not read it as a Robinhood Chain adoption story.

Read the context

Robinhood Ventures Fund I began trading on the NYSE on 6 March 2026 under the ticker RVI. It is a closed-end fund advised by Robinhood Ventures, a registered investment adviser owned by Robinhood Markets. The newsroom list of holdings after this announcement includes Airwallex, Boom, Canva, Crusoe, Databricks, ElevenLabs, Mercor, OpenAI, Oura, Ramp, Revolut, SpaceX, Stripe, and Whatnot. Unlike a typical venture fund, RVI shares can be bought without accreditation or a minimum check, though the underlying private companies stay illiquid and the fund itself is high risk. Crusoe started as a crypto-adjacent energy business and now sells AI factories and cloud. Reuters and Crusoe's own round coverage say the Series F was co-led by Atreides Management, Mubadala Capital, and Valor Equity Partners, with Nvidia and others in the syndicate. Robinhood's disclosure is that RVI bought about $25 million of preferred stock in that round. No Robinhood Chain integration, token listing, or customer product was announced with the investment.

Link to this story

Robinhood will livestream HOOD Summit on 29-30 September for new active-trader tools

@RobinhoodApp told followers to tune in 29-30 September. Official pages put HOOD Summit '26 in Houston, with Chairman and CEO Vlad Tenev's keynote at 5:30 p.m. Central on 29 September, livestreamed in the Robinhood app, on X, YouTube and robinhood.com/presents. The company says the keynote will show new tools for active traders, and that 30 September main-stage sessions will also stream. No product list, including any Robinhood Chain feature, has been published. The dates are announced, not a guaranteed launch.

Why it matters This is a scheduled product window for Robinhood users and anyone watching Robinhood Chain, not a live button. Treat social rumors as unverified until the livestream names what is shipping, where, and when.

Read the context

Robinhood Chain is Robinhood's permissionless Ethereum Layer 2, built on Arbitrum technology, using ETH for gas and aimed at tokenized stocks and onchain apps. HOOD Summit is the company's annual event. A 10 August newsroom post already set Houston for 29-30 September. The 16 September teaser does not change those dates. In late September, Central Time is daylight time (UTC-5), so 5:30 p.m. CT is 22:30 UTC. Specific chain, wallet or brokerage features remain unnamed until the keynote.

Link to this story

Solana

3 developments

Solana 250ms slots are live on mainnet-beta, with 200ms still to come

@anza_xyz said 250-millisecond slots are live on Solana mainnet-beta, following SIMD-0525. Its earlier post said the change would take effect at the epoch 1037 boundary, about 05:01 UTC on 18 September. @solana quoted the live notice and linked a slot-time monitor at solana.com/200ms. A slot is how often the network tries to produce a block. Solana had already moved from 400ms to 350ms to 300ms. Anza said one more cut, to 200ms, remains. The posts do not publish measured post-activation times or a 200ms mainnet date.

Why it matters Wallets, DEX routers, and bots that assumed 300ms timing now have a shorter clock. Independent write-ups of SIMD-0525 say per-slot compute limits fall with the cut, and a typical blockhash expires faster, so a signed transaction can go stale sooner if an app waits too long. 200ms is the stated next step, not a live mainnet change. Readers can watch solana.com/200ms rather than treat the Anza post as a latency benchmark.

Read the context

Solana is a high-throughput blockchain used for payments, DeFi, and token trading. Time on the network is counted in slots: each slot is a chance for a validator to produce a block. SIMD-0525 is the staged plan to shorten that interval from 400ms toward 200ms. Anza, the lab behind Agave validator software, queued the 250ms feature on 16 September and said SIMD-0525 features take effect one epoch after they activate. Epoch 1035 was pending, epoch 1036 was feature-active, and epoch 1037 was when 250ms slots were scheduled to go live. On 18 September at 05:06 UTC, Anza said that live step had happened. Solana's own account repeated "250ms slots" and pointed operators and users to solana.com/200ms, a public monitor for slot times and related stats. The page did not return live numbers in this check, so this edition relies on the Anza and Solana posts, not an independent measurement of average slot time after the boundary. Solana Compass, writing before activation, described the protocol effects that come with the cut: maximum block compute units drop to 37.5 million from 45 million at 300ms, the writable-account cap falls to 15 million from 18 million, a 432,000-slot epoch lasts about 30 hours instead of about 36, and the 150-blockhash window closes in about 37.5 seconds. Those figures describe the design, not a post-upgrade performance audit. Anza has said 200ms is the last stop on this staircase and that it is already used on development and test networks. No mainnet date for 200ms was included in the live posts. Validators still running older software can lag the new timing. Users do not need to do anything to "enable" 250ms; the change is at the protocol level. What they may notice is faster block attempts, tighter retry windows, and the same overall compute budget spread across more frequent, smaller slots.

Link to this story

Rumble RUM is listed on Solana via Sunrise, with Raydium trading live

@sunrise said $RUM is listed on Solana and issued by Backpack Securities. It posted canonical mint RUMsPfFZFnN1ZmGANwP7FNMjKH4m9RiMePrtVtLe7 as the Solana version. Hours later, @Raydium said $RUM is live on Raydium, calling Rumble a video-sharing and cloud company now trading around the clock via Sunrise and Backpack Securities. Sunrise is a Solana listing venue that brings assets, including tokenized stocks, onto DEX markets. The posts do not publish U.S. eligibility, redemption mechanics, or any claim that this ticker falls under the SEC Innovation Exemption.

Why it matters Solana users can inspect a Rumble ticker in a wallet and trade it on Raydium if the pool is live, which is a different product from Nasdaq-hours RUM shares. That matters for anyone comparing tokenized-stock venues after the SEC's exemption news. Readers still need issuer terms before treating the token as a claim on the listed stock. The mint Sunrise posted is the identifier to check against copycat tickers.

Read the context

Sunrise lists assets on Solana and coordinates a canonical token plus day-one liquidity. Its docs describe a partnership with Backpack Securities in which Backpack handles brokerage-side issuance of tokenized equities and Sunrise handles the onchain listing. That pipeline has already been used for other tickers. Rumble, ticker RUM on Nasdaq, runs a video platform and, after buying Northern Data, a cloud and AI infrastructure business. On 17 September Sunrise said RUM was listed on Solana via that Backpack Securities route and published mint RUMsPfFZFnN1ZmGANwP7FNMjKH4m9RiMePrtVtLe7, calling it the canonical Solana version. Raydium, a major Solana DEX, later said the token was live there for 24/7 trading. Those are listing and venue posts. They do not, in the evidence reviewed, attach a prospectus, a 1:1 redemption workflow for this ticker, or a statement that U.S. persons can buy it. Other Sunrise stock tokens have been described as redeemable for real shares in separate cases; that should not be copied onto RUM without RUM-specific terms. The listing is also separate from the SEC's 17 September Innovation Exemption, which applies to permissioned Tokenized Securities Venues trading tokenized NMS stock under stated conditions, not to every DEX ticker that shares a stock's name. Traders should confirm the mint, the issuer name on the Sunrise record, and the pool they are using. Fake RUM memecoins exist on Solana under other addresses.

Link to this story

INJ is live on Solana via Sunrise, with Raydium pools and Jupiter swaps

@injective said INJ is live on Solana with @Raydium as a day-one launch partner, so users can trade INJ against SOL and other Solana tokens around the clock. @sunrise listed it as the canonical Solana version. Injective's blog gives contract address 1NJMqVM4PadjuzYmeB7zV7q7DV8oB3ExaQCd9x6KsLz, says initial liquidity is on Raydium, and that StonkFun now lets creators pair new tokens with INJ. Later the same day, Injective said INJ swaps were live on Jupiter. Other wallet and lending hooks were described as coming, not all live.

Why it matters INJ is the native token of Injective, a separate finance-focused chain. A canonical Solana copy lets Solana wallets and DEXs trade it without using Injective itself. That is a new market to inspect, not a wrap of every Injective app. Contract address and venue matter because unofficial copies are common.

Read the context

Injective is a layer 1 built for trading, tokenization, and onchain finance. INJ is used for staking, fees, and governance on that network. Sunrise is a Solana gateway that coordinates an official token version, liquidity, and listings so an outside asset has one canonical mint on Solana. Injective's 17 September blog says this is its first major expansion onto Solana, with launch liquidity seeded on Raydium and StonkFun supporting INJ as a base pair for new token launches, including tokenized-stock style markets. A later Injective post said swaps were live on Jupiter, Solana's main routing interface. The blog lists possible next venues, including Phantom, Backpack, Kamino, and Meteora, as examples rather than completed integrations. Readers can check the published mint, Raydium pools, and Jupiter routes. Holding Solana INJ is not the same as using Injective's own exchange, tokenized-mortgage records, or transfer-agent stack.

Link to this story

Base

2 developments

Base delays Batches 004 team names to 29 September after 750 applications

@base said Base Batches 004 drew more than 750 applications, a record, so the selected teams will be announced on 29 September. An earlier @base post said 10 early-stage teams would receive up to $100,000 in investment subject to diligence, eight weeks of mentorship, and a Demo Day place in New York. Applications had already closed on 10 September. The new post changes the announcement date. It does not change the prize terms stated in those posts, and selection is still not a completed investment.

Why it matters Base Batches is Coinbase/Base's accelerator for early onchain teams. Builders who applied, and users who follow Demo Day launches, now have a dated checkpoint. It is a program schedule change, not a chain upgrade or token launch.

Read the context

Base is Coinbase's Ethereum layer 2. Base Batches is a recurring program that puts a small set of early-stage teams through mentorship and, if diligence clears, a capped investment, then a public Demo Day. The 004 application window closed on 10 September 2026 at 11:59 p.m. Pacific, according to Base's earlier post. Today's update is that screening is taking longer because more than 750 teams applied. The 29 September date is an announced reveal, not a guarantee that ten deals close that day or that every listed benefit lands unchanged. Tokenized equities were not part of this announcement. @buildonbase separately hosted a tokenized-equities builder roundtable the same afternoon and repeated that tokenized equities are not available to U.S. users. That roundtable is discussion, not a listing.

Link to this story

Base and Ethereum still split on wallet standards, and Cobalt's published list omits EIP-8130

Ethlabs’ @decentrek said talks to merge Base-led EIP-8130 with Ethereum’s EIP-8141 broke down last week. Both drafts aim to make wallets easier with passkeys, apps paying fees and bundled actions. CoinDesk reports wallets that span both networks may have to support two transaction formats. Neither design is live on mainnet. Base's official Cobalt page now dates Sepolia to 23 September 2026 and mainnet to 30 September 2026, listing B20 changes, validity transactions, dynamic upgrades and a TEE migration, not EIP-8130.

Why it matters Wallet and app teams that assumed a shared September ship for Base native accounts should re-read Cobalt's feature list. Ethereum's Hegotá track and Base's test work can still move, but they are no longer one standard.

Read the context

Account abstraction is the effort to make crypto wallets feel closer to normal apps: sign in with a passkey, let an app pay the fee, and batch several steps into one confirmation. Base pushed EIP-8130 for scale, customization and compliance. Ethereum's EIP-8141, also called Frame Transactions, is aimed at censorship resistance, privacy and post-quantum readiness. After months of talks, that merge attempt failed. CoinDesk's 16 September write-up is why the split is still the live watch item: multi-chain wallets may need two transaction formats. EIP-8141 remains a must-ship candidate for Ethereum’s Hegotá upgrade. EIP-8130 has been exercised on Base’s Vibenet test network. An earlier assumption that EIP-8130 would ride Base's September Cobalt upgrade does not match Base's current Cobalt documentation, which instead lists B20 token-standard improvements, validity transactions that execute only when onchain conditions match, dynamic node upgrades in metrics-only mode on mainnet, and a move of Base infrastructure into a Trusted Execution Environment. Those Cobalt dates are published targets, not a guarantee, and the official page does not give a clock time. B20 itself has been live on Base mainnet since the June Beryl upgrade. It is a native, ERC-20 compatible token type with issuer controls. That is separate from the wallet-standard fight.

Link to this story

Arc

3 developments

Arc Studio launches as an AI workspace to generate and export Arc apps

@arc introduced Arc Studio, an AI workspace at studio.arc.io for building onchain apps on Arc, Circle's USDC-gas layer 1 that opened public mainnet on 16 September. Arc's blog says a user describes an idea in plain language and Studio generates frontend, backend, and smart contracts, with Circle stack integrations, and that the code can be exported and inspected. Apps can be tested across nine chains, including Arc, Base, and Ethereum. Circle says Studio does not deploy, sign, fund, or submit mainnet transactions for the user. Generated code can be wrong or unsafe.

Why it matters Day-two Arc needs builders, not only launch partners. Studio lowers the first-prototype step, but it is not a audited live app store. Anyone using it on mainnet still has to review, deploy, and fund transactions themselves.

Read the context

Arc is Circle's layer 1 for dollar payments, tokenized assets, and onchain apps. Fees are paid in USDC. Public mainnet opened on 16 September 2026 with a permissioned validator set. Arc Studio is offered by Circle Technology Services as an AI coding agent. The 17 September blog says it understands Circle tools such as CCTP, Contracts, Gateway, and Wallets, and can pull in protocol components from partners including Aave, Morpho, and Uniswap, with whom Circle has commercial relationships. Developers can start in the browser or drive Studio from tools such as Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor. The same post is explicit about limits: AI output may be inaccurate, incomplete, or insecure; Studio does not interact with mainnet on the user's behalf; mainnet use is the user's own credentials and risk. That distinction matters on a chain that is only a day old. Studio is a build path, not proof that a given generated app is safe or licensed.

Link to this story

Arc offers 20 microgrants of $500 USDC for live mainnet mini apps

@arc said it will award 20 microgrants of $500 USDC to eligible early builders shipping working mini apps on Arc mainnet. The Arc House page puts the pool at 10,000 USDC and says submissions need a live mainnet link and a public repo. Submissions close 14 October 2026 at 23:59 ET, with all decisions by 21 October. Testnet-only work, mockups, and projects already funded by a Circle or Arc program are ineligible. Payout is in USDC on Arc after verification. Awards are not guaranteed, and program counts can change.

Why it matters This is a concrete, small-dollar path onto a one-day-old chain. It is for deployed experiments, not slide decks. Builders need USDC on Arc for gas. It is separate from Circle's larger production grant program.

Read the context

Arc opened public mainnet on 16 September 2026. Microgrants are meant for side projects, prototypes, hackathon follow-ons, and first deployments rather than funded startups. The rules allow individuals and teams worldwide, subject to sanctions screening, and allow pseudonymous submissions until payout verification. One submission is allowed per project. Recipients keep their intellectual property. Because Arc charges gas in USDC, a submitter already has to hold and spend USDC on Arc to have a live app. That is a real hurdle and also the point of the program: prove something runs on the new chain. Circle also advertises a separate developer grant program for production teams building on Arc and Circle's stack, with milestone-based funding. The microgrant page says it will route more advanced projects toward that program. Neither grant is an investment, listing, or user-facing app launch.

Link to this story

CoinDesk: Arc's first day was memecoin trading, not USDC payments

CoinDesk reported that Arc, Circle's USDC-gas layer 1 that opened public mainnet on 16 September, processed 7.83 million transactions in its first 24 hours, while Arc's Blockscout explorer showed only about 624,000 USDC transfers over the chain's life. Day-one DEX volume was about $82 million, compared with the $878 million CoinDesk cited for Robinhood Chain's July memecoin surge. Tokens including TOLLY, LONG, and COOL were down 56% to 77% from launch highs by Thursday morning. The figures are CoinDesk's reading of explorer and DefiLlama data, not a Circle statement.

Why it matters Arc is being sold as rails for payments, FX, and tokenized assets, with Studio and microgrants aimed at builders. First-day usage, as reported, looked like speculative token trading. Anyone bridging USDC, deploying an app, or judging early traction should inspect the explorer and DEX dashboards rather than treat launch-day transaction counts as payments volume. Token prices in that tape can move fast and are not a test of the validator set.

Read the context

Arc is Circle's layer 1. Fees are paid in USDC, settlement is designed to be sub-second, and a permissioned founding validator group includes firms such as BlackRock, Visa, and Mastercard. Public mainnet opened on 16 September with apps and protocols that include Aave, Morpho, and Uniswap, plus builder tools such as Arc Studio. Circle has framed the chain as infrastructure for programmable money, not as a memecoin venue. CoinDesk's 17 September report said the first day's blocks were dominated by memecoins instead. It cited 7.83 million transactions in 24 hours, about 400,000 new accounts, more than 73,000 contracts deployed, and average fees rising to about three cents, against a much smaller USDC transfer count on the chain's explorer. DEX volume of about $82 million was presented as far below Robinhood Chain's July memecoin burst. Named tokens TOLLY, LONG, and COOL were already sharply off their launch highs by the next morning, which is a reminder that launch-day prints are not the same as retained activity. CoinDesk also said a Circle product lead posted an AI-generated image promoting a memecoin on launch day. That is a reported social-media incident, not an official token listing by Circle. None of this cancels the institutional validator roster or the builder programs. It does show what filled the chain when it was opened to the public. Users paying gas in USDC, bridging in, or trying early DeFi should still treat contracts, tokens, and launchpads as untrusted until they verify them. Arc's native ARC token mint is a separate Circle technical step and is not a public sale.

Link to this story

Elsewhere in crypto

3 developments

SEC issues a five-year Innovation Exemption for permissioned onchain stock trading

@SECGov said the Commission issued a temporary, conditional order so Tokenized Securities Venues can trade tokenized NMS stock through permissioned automated market makers and liquidity pools without being treated as an exchange under the Exchange Act. Liquidity providers can get parallel relief from dealer registration. Chairman Atkins said a venue must be a U.S. person, keep access permissioned, reject synthetics that lack the same rights as the listed share, and let issuers object. Relief expires five years after publication. It is not coverage for every stock token already trading on crypto apps.

Why it matters This is the first SEC path for onchain trading of real U.S. listed shares in AMM-style pools. It matters for tokenization venues, issuers, and chains that can host public, auditable contracts. Permissionless synthetic stock tokens are outside this order. Public comment is open on next steps.

Read the context

NMS stock means shares that already trade in the U.S. national market system, such as names listed on the NYSE or Nasdaq. Tokenization here means a blockchain token that is supposed to carry the same rights as that share, including dividends and voting, issued by or for the company or by an unaffiliated third party. The order creates Tokenized Securities Venues: operators of permissioned AMM liquidity pools plus access rules. Those venues get a time-limited exemption from the Exchange Act definition of exchange. Some liquidity providers get an exemption from the dealer definition. Conditions in the press release and Atkins statement include symbol and volume limits, same rights as the traditional share, written notice and an objection right for issuers when a third party tokenizes the stock, public auditable smart contracts on a public permissionless ledger, trading halts that match the primary listing exchange, public reporting, OFAC compliance, and U.S.-person status for the venue. Anti-fraud rules still apply. The Commission asked for comment on changes and follow-on rulemaking. The Senate had just failed to advance the CLARITY Act. This staff-and-commission order is a narrower, temporary substitute, not a market-structure statute. Robinhood, Solana, Base, and other chains are relevant only if a venue on those networks actually meets the conditions and relies on the exemption.

Link to this story

CFTC staff expands no-action relief to passive trading software providers

@CFTC said its Market Participants Division issued a no-action position for providers of passive software. Subject to specified conditions, staff will not recommend enforcement against those providers or their relevant personnel for failing to register as an introducing broker, or as an associated person of one, when the software is provided and marketed so users can trade with registered futures commission merchants, introducing brokers, and designated contract markets. The release says the position is similar to Staff Letter 26-09, the earlier Phantom wallet relief, and is now broadly available. It is staff relief, not a Commission rule.

Why it matters Wallets and other software that pass users to regulated futures, options, or event-contract markets had been in a grey zone. This letter generalizes Phantom-specific relief. It does not bless every crypto bot, and providers still have to meet the letter's conditions, including not stepping into a broker's role.

Read the context

An introducing broker is a person who solicits or accepts commodity-interest orders without holding customer margin. Crypto wallets that display derivatives or prediction-market buttons have worried they might fall into that category. In March the CFTC staff gave Phantom a tailored no-action letter (Staff Letter 26-09) for self-custodial wallet software that routes users to registered firms and designated contract markets. Letter 26-25, announced 17 September as CFTC press release 9300-26, says a similar position is now available more broadly to passive software providers. The official release does not reprint every condition. Secondary reporting describes limits such as not taking custody, not choosing where orders go, and keeping the user a customer of the registered firm rather than of the software provider. Those extra details should be checked against the staff letter itself at cftc.gov. The relief lasts until staff or the Commission replaces it. It can matter for wallets on Solana, Ethereum, Base, and elsewhere that want to attach regulated event contracts or other CFTC products. It is not a registration holiday for discretionary trading agents or for platforms that hold customer funds.

Link to this story

OFAC sanctions Iranian exchange BitBank over alleged bitcoin flows to the IRGC

@USTreasury said OFAC designated BitBank, an Iranian digital-asset venture it says is controlled by already-sanctioned financier Babak Zanjani, plus developer Pishtaz Simorgh Electronic Trade Company and three associates. Treasury alleges BitBank moved hundreds of millions of dollars in bitcoin to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and processed payments for the already-designated Hormuz Safe Marine Services Authority. U.S. persons generally cannot deal with designated parties. This is the Iranian BitBank named by Treasury, not an unrelated exchange that shares a similar name.

Why it matters Exchanges, wallets, and stablecoin issuers will be expected to block the newly listed names. Anyone who used BitBank rails for bitcoin or Hormuz-related payments now faces sanctions exposure. It is an enforcement action, not a market-structure rule.

Read the context

OFAC is the U.S. Treasury office that maintains the Specially Designated Nationals list. Designation freezes property of the named persons that is in the United States or held by U.S. persons, and generally bars U.S. persons from dealing with them. Treasury placed this action under Operation Economic Outcast and Executive Order 13902, which it uses against Iran's digital-asset sector. Zanjani and other related exchanges were already designated earlier in 2026. Today's add-on is BitBank, its software developer Pishtaz Simorgh, Hossein Ali Zaker Hossein, Mohammad Mahdi Zaker Hossein, and Seyed Adel Heidari. Treasury's allegations about IRGC bitcoin transfers and Hormuz transit payments are the government's case, not an independent court finding in this release. Compliance teams should pull the official SDN entries rather than matching on the common commercial name BitBank alone.

Link to this story